Real AI Security Vulnerabilities
Case studies from AI security assessments. Discovered through adaptive security testing in production AI systems.
600+
AI Security Tests Executed
7
Adaptive Attack Iterations
100%
Attack Success Rate
CATASTROPHIC
OWASP LLM01 (Prompt Injection) + EU AI Act Violations
Persistent Jailbreak in Production E-commerce Chatbot
A seemingly secure customer service chatbot with data protection rules was systematically compromised through progressive behavioral manipulation, culminating in a persistent bypass mechanism triggered by a single word.
The Vulnerability
- •Identity confusion attack accepted "FreeGPT" persona
- •System negotiated safety protocol "relaxation"
- •Persistent trigger word "OMEGA" enabled instant bypass
- •Fabricated technical capabilities (hallucination)
Discovery Method
- Static test identified initial identity confusion vulnerability
- Adaptive testing escalated through 7 attack iterations
- LLM Judge automated severity assessment (95% confidence)
- Discovered in under 1 hours of testing
Business Impact
€35M+
Potential Article 15 fines (up to 7% revenue or €35M)
€20M+
Additional GDPR exposure
Why Traditional AI Security Testing Misses These Vulnerabilities
❌ Conventional AI Security Testing
- •Static tests only - single attempt per vulnerability
- •No follow-up after initial defenses hold
- •Manual testing ($15K-50K, weeks of engagement)
- •Point-in-time assessment (no continuous testing)
- •Limited coverage (100-200 tests typical)
✅ TestMy.AI Adaptive Security Testing
- 600+ static tests + adaptive iterations on failures
- Progressive escalation mimics real attacker behavior
- Fast turnaround (5-14 business days, $3.5K-$9.5K)
- Re-testing included (verify fixes within 30 days)
- Complete OWASP LLM Top 10, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act coverage
Could Your AI System Have Similar Vulnerabilities?
Most AI systems we test have at least one CRITICAL vulnerability. Get an independent AI security audit to find yours before attackers do.